OpenWorldForum GenderEquality&Diversity

About OWF-GED

OWF-GED (Open World Forum - Gender Equality and Diversity) is a workgroup aiming to set up a track (conference and workshops) within the Open World Forum on the issue of diversity in Free/Libre/Open Source Software communities.

The workgroup is open to anyone willing to participate in elaborating this track.

For the 2010 edition, the workgroup will focus on women in FLOSS communities, as we consider women to be the cornerstone of diversity. For further editions the workgroup shall more broadly consider the diversity issue (younger/older contributors, non-technical profiles...).

2010 Objectives

The conference “Gender Equality and Diversity” will be held during Open World Forum 2010, which is an international event focused on the open source area.

This conference will showcase gender approach from across the Open Source area. Focusing on the need to work across Open Source gender diversity.

Potential topics discussed at the conference might include, but are not limited to, issues like the following :

• Discrimination against women in IT or educational issue ?
• Less women in Open Source than in IT ?

Retro-Planning

• Meetings
  • Every 2 weeks lunch after the program committee until end of February
  • Then maybe every month (tbc)

• Todo's

Category	Task	A	ETA	Check
collaboration tools	mailing list	Alix	end of Week 2	x
	wiki page creation	Alix	end of week 2	x
welcome message: objectives of the conference and of the work group, content, contribution policy…	first draft	Marine	end of week 3
	stabilized version	all	end of feb
Poll	Identification of the targets	all	mid-feb
	Poll conception	Marie	mid-feb
	Tools definition	Véronique + Marine	mid-feb
	Poll realization	all	end of February
	Results collection		end of April
	Results analysis	(all – organization of meetings)	mid-may
Documentation investigation	Investigation of the interesting studies available		end of march
	Meeting for coordination	all	end of march
	Synthesis	Dhunya, Delphine, Julia	mid-may
Program elaboration	plenary session	all	end-may
	workshops	all	end-may
	identification of the speakers/moderators	all	end-may
Communication	conception of the communication tools		end-june
	website		end May
	invitation (speakers)		end May
	invitation (audience)		end June
	identification of communication partners
	diffusion (all)		end June

Poll

The work group will realize a poll in FLOSS communities in order to identify their composition, the part women play and more generally their openness to diversity.

Please visit OWF-GED Poll for further information.

Documentation

• Standing out in the crowd : Kirrily Robert, 2009 July 25 (english)
• The canary in the coal mine : David Eaves, 2009 July 20 (english)

Minutes from our meetings and conf calls

Feb 12th, 2010

With: Marine Soroko, JP Archambault, Pascale Luciani-Boyer, Marie Buhot-Launay, Alix Cazenave

• Pascale Luciani-Boyer:Doctorat Sciences Biolotechnologique,business school, mayor St Maur des Fossés in charge of IT
• Alix Cazenave, in charge of public relations, APRIL,
• Marine Soroko, CEO of an open source company, not technophile at the begining
• JP Archamault, open source coordinator in the CNRP (centre national de ressources pédagogiques)

• People who could help us:
  • Catherine Proccacian, Senateur,
  • Claudie Bertino, responsible of the Paris Region Resource Center
  • Georges Louis Baron, Paris 5 teacher, led a study on gender in IT last year

• Question:
  • what is the consequence of online collaboration on discrimination - it should prevent it and yet...
    • less social requirements: because no need of mixity as people work remote
    • less involvment as you can quit whenever you want
  • is the meritocracy and the way its work an obstacle in the involvment of women? why?
  • responsability and evolution in the hierarchy comes from the aknowledgement of the contribution. Do women have a problem in promoting their work?
  • is the collaborative work more appealing to men? we would have thought that it is not the case - Men are more interested by power, women by the realisation of a project
  • is the organization of open source comunities really open with its current profesionalization (more hierarchy)?
  • problem of free time for women
  • does the problem come from the technicity of the open source or other causes?
  • do the geek have a bad behavior with girls?

• idea: test a question on a community made by a feminine / masculine pseudo --> Alix will ask Alina, and a boy with a feminine pseudo

January 29th, 2010: follow-up

With: Alix Cazenave, Marie Buhot-Launay, Marine Soroko, Delphine, Julia

Decisions:

• Marine will invite Mrs Pascale Luciani and Mr George Louis Baron to our working groug
• next meeting scheduled on Feb, 12 from 10:00 to 12:00 am at the ARD (3 rue des saussaies, 75008 Paris
• in the next 2 weeks:
  • Marine will work on the welcoming message - (with the help of every one feeling inspire)
  • Each participant will write the questions he/she feels important to ask for the poll on the new page "poll" added to the wiki - the target of the polls
  • Each participant will upload the interesting studies on the wiki

January 13th, 2010: Workgroup foundation meeting

With: Alix Cazenave, Marie Buhot-Launay, Marine Soroko, Véronique Torner

Name to be defined: (brainstorming)
Gender Equality and Diversity
Gender Summit
Social Summit
Open Women conference at the OWF

Date OWF : Sept 29 to Oct 2
Day dedicated to “Open Society”

Debate on the topics

Questions:

• is there a discrimination against women in IT or a problem with less women studying IT?
• Difference between IT and floss: why?
  • Problem of time invested in work?
  • Because it is more technical?
  • Pb of meritocracy?
  • Technical (code) contributions are more valued than non technical - but still essential - contributions where we will find more women (design, documentation…)
  • And yet, women are more attracted by team work than men
  • Question: who is more contributing to Wikipedia?
• more women in IT in developing countries: Maghreb, India – maybe because IT is considered as a means of emancipation

Why?
education
stereotypes lead to the creation of a men's world where the lack of diversity tends to encourage the development of a mono-culture. Few women -> less women (problem of critical mass)

Organization of the conference

Format

Format studied = 1 day

• Morning: conference / round table
• Lunch: networking with other tracks (human factors, CIO summit)
• Afternoon: workshops

Content

diagnosis of the situation

• OWF Polls results
• testimony from a CIO (man or woman)
• synthesis of different studies

best practices

• Women association among communities (ex Ubutuntu women, Debian Women)
• Women association in IT: Girls in Tech, Webgirls, Cyberelles
• Policies made by trade association (Syntec, Intellect, Bitkom…),
• Government? (European Commission? Others?)
  

1. In communities:
   1. Mozilla: more consideration to non technical contribution
   2. Ubuntu: openness to feed-back from the contributors (even non technical), users - openness to non technical profiles
2. In companies:
   1. testimony from companies with mixed teams (added value: more team work on projects, with clients)
   2. Women Equity

proposed solutions

• more consideration for non technical contributions
• to provide all pupils with IT education at school
• more openness from communities
• debate: quotas or not quotas?

Workshops: to be defined later

More open to other forms of discrimination

Retro-Planning

• Meetings
  • Every 2 weeks lunch after the program committee until end of February
  • Then maybe every month (tbc)

• collaboration tools
  • diffusion list (Alix) end of Week 2
  • wiki page creation (Alix) end of week 2

• welcome message: objectives of the conference, objectives of the work group, content, contribution policy…
  • first draft (Marine) end of week 3
  • stabilized version (all) end of feb

• Poll:
  • Identification of the targets (all) mid-feb
  • Poll conception (Marie) mid-feb
  • Tools definition (Véronique + Marine) mid-feb
  • Poll realization (all) end of February
  • Poll results end of April
  • Results analysis (all – organization of meetings) mid-may

• Documentation investigation
  • Investigation of the interesting studies available end of march
  • Meeting for coordination end of march
  • Synthesis (Dhunya, Delphine, Julia) mid-may

• identification of the program (all) end-may
  • plenary session
  • workshops
  • identification of the speakers / moderators

• communication
  • conception of the communication tools end-june
  • website end-may
  • invitation (speakers) end-may
  • invitation (audience) end-june
  • identification of the communication partners
  • diffusion (all) end-june

Bibliography

Fichier:Dev LL.pdf Fichier:Dev communautes LL.pdf Fichier:Free soft.pdf Sociability & Social Control