Unitary Patent : Différence entre versions

De April MediaWiki
(What's the issue ?)
m (Email by a company)
Ligne 27 : Ligne 27 :
  
 
===Email by a company===
 
===Email by a company===
 +
 +
Dear Member of the European Parliament,
 +
 +
Our company is worried about the current plans to set up a unitary patent with
 +
a flanking unified patent court.
 +
 +
The European Patent Office (EPO)'s practices to grant software patents, under
 +
the deceiving term of “computer-implemented inventions”, pose a threat to our
 +
professional activities.
 +
 +
We are concerned that the regulation on the unitary patent, as agreed in
 +
December 2011 by the negotiators of the Council, the Commission, and the
 +
Committee on Legal Affairs of the European Parliament, leaves any and every
 +
issue on the limits of patentability to the EPO's case law, without any
 +
democratic control or review by an independent court.
 +
 +
The regulation on the unitary patent is an opportunity for the EU legislators
 +
to harmonise substantive patent law in the EU institutional and jurisdictional
 +
framework, and to put an end to the EPO's self-motivated practices extending
 +
the realm of patentability to software. Failing to do so, this unitary patent
 +
will do more harm than good to the EU ICT firms.
 +
 +
For these reasons, we urge MEPs to adopt amendments which clearly state that
 +
the EPO's decisions are subject to a review from the Court of Justice of the
 +
European Union, and which reaffirm the rejection of software patentability,
 +
as expressed by the vote of the European Parliament on September 24th, 2003
 +
and July 6th, 2005.
 +
 +
<signature>
  
 
==How to contact a MEP by phone==
 
==How to contact a MEP by phone==

Version du 31 août 2012 à 16:04

The proposal for a Unitary Patent and the threat it represents

The Unitary Patent is a proposal for a European regulation, which was first filed in April, 2011. Its aim is to unify patent titles and jurisdiction between interested member states, through a enhanced cooperation.

The idea behind the project is not problematic in itself. However, the way the project is currently organized is concerning for April: most of the resources would be given to the European Patent Office (EPO), whose drift in favor of sotfware patents have been long criticized by April.

What's the issue ?

  • Threat of software patents coming to Europe in spite of the prohibition by the European Parliament in 2005
  • Threat of patent trolls appearing in Europe (companies which file or buy patents with the only aim of getting royalty payments from other companies
  • Threat of big legal actions on software patents, like the Apple/ Samsung case


The issues in a few words

Why should I contact MEPs ?

The MEPs information campaign

How to contact a MEP

Email

Example of an email sent by a citizen

Email by a company

Dear Member of the European Parliament,

Our company is worried about the current plans to set up a unitary patent with
a flanking unified patent court.

The European Patent Office (EPO)'s practices to grant software patents, under
the deceiving term of “computer-implemented inventions”, pose a threat to our
professional activities.

We are concerned that the regulation on the unitary patent, as agreed in
December 2011 by the negotiators of the Council, the Commission, and the
Committee on Legal Affairs of the European Parliament, leaves any and every
issue on the limits of patentability to the EPO's case law, without any
democratic control or review by an independent court.

The regulation on the unitary patent is an opportunity for the EU legislators
to harmonise substantive patent law in the EU institutional and jurisdictional
framework, and to put an end to the EPO's self-motivated practices extending
the realm of patentability to software. Failing to do so, this unitary patent
will do more harm than good to the EU ICT firms.

For these reasons, we urge MEPs to adopt amendments which clearly state that
the EPO's decisions are subject to a review from the Court of Justice of the
European Union, and which reaffirm the rejection of software patentability,
as expressed by the vote of the European Parliament on September 24th, 2003
and July 6th, 2005.

<signature>

How to contact a MEP by phone

Short version

Long version